George Floyd death: How will jurors be selected in Derek Chauvin trial?

It was video footage seen across the world – Derek Chauvin with his knee pressed on the neck of George Floyd for about nine minutes before he died.
Now the former US police officer faces trial on second-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter charges.
Three other dismissed officers will stand trial together later this year but proceedings in Chauvin’s trial will start Monday, when jury selection begins.
How will the jury be picked?
A pool of eligible local citizens have been called to appear by Hennepin County in Minnesota. From them, a jury of 12 and four alternates will be selected.
Potential jurors will be questioned to determine if they’ll be able to judge Derek Chauvin fairly. Each will have already received a 16-page questionnaire asking about their familiarity with the case, their news habits and their own interactions with law enforcement.
It includes direct questions about how many times they saw the video of George Floyd’s death and if they participated in, or had property damaged during, the subsequent protests.
Starting Monday, four potential jurors will appear each morning and afternoon to be individually questioned to assess their suitability.The prosecution and defence can both ask Judge Peter Cahill to dismiss a potential juror “for cause” if they perceive a bias or conflict under questioning.
They can also use a limited amount of “peremptory challenges” to strike that person from the pool without giving a reason – the prosecution has nine of these and Chauvin’s defence team 15.
The last 30 minutes of George Floyd’s life
How are African-Americans treated under the law?
‘Stop yelling’, officer told gasping George Floyd
If either side suspects someone has been discriminated against because of something like sex or race – their dismissal can be objected to.
Once 16 people have been approved, the jury can be seated. This process may take weeks and we already know the trial itself will not begin until 29 March.
How is this process different to the UK?
The right to trial by jury is guaranteed in the US constitution. In England and Wales, jury trials are less common.
Jurors in the UK are picked at random from a pool and don’t know which trial they will serve on until they’ve been sworn in to help avoid pre-judgement. There are also much stricter reporting restrictions in place in the UK press to ensure suspects receive a fair trial.Eligible candidates are not subjected to cross-examination and can only dismissed by a judge in very specific circumstances, like if they know a victim. In theory it would be possible to have a panel of all-male or female jurors randomly selected.
The US vetting system has greater emphasis on ensuring a cross-section of society is represented. In cases involving issues like racism, the selection process can be seen as hugely important to the outcome of the trial and how fair it is perceived.
High-stakes US jury trials will more than likely involve special consultants who help lawyers research and select jurors to try and get a favourable outcome. Factors like the jurors’ backgrounds and their body language may even be considered within their trial strategy.
Jurors will be partially sequestered, or isolated, during Chauvin’s trial and fully sequestered once deliberation starts. They will also remain anonymous until the judge allows their identities to be made public.
It’s not uncommon for US jurors to speak out about their deliberations afterwards and in some infamous examples like the OJ Simpson trial, some have even gone on to write books about their experiences.

No Comments Yet.

Leave a Reply